Masato Kato also suggested that Cross could take place in an alternate timeline to Trigger, and I think he also said Cross is a story about loss (and CT isn't about loss). Chrono Trigger had more writers contributing to it and had different people directing it.
While Cross' story is deep and interesting, it is in a different style. I would say that Cross isn't a closely relatable experience to CT - and, according to writer Masato Kato, that was by design.
By that rationale, people could say that Final Fantasy games are story sequels because they contain Chocobos, and a bunch of other similarities. Having a recurring character (though, Cross has exclusively Masato Kato's take on Lavos) isn't all that it takes to create a full sequel. I've certainly played CC, multiple times.Įdit: I'll add, Chrono Cross is one of my favourite games. It is about as direct a sequel you could make while having a new main cast and central location. Everything happens because Belthasar is sent to a pristine future after Lavos is killed in Trigger, and in the end you are still trying to stop Lavos from destroying the world. but it isn't a direct sequel to CT's story.Have you not played it? It is definitely a sequel to Trigger's story.
Like I said, it's a sequel in the series, in the general world.
0 kommentar(er)
